Are Drug Addicts Victims Or Criminals?

This article is about people who are addicted to illegalbe legal is a subject for another article.). In the
drugs, not people who become addicted tosecond place, money used to buy marijuana goes to
prescription drugs that were originaly prescribed by acriminals and is in many instances used to commit
licensed physician for a legitimate reason.more crimes. In the third place, some people resort
According to most defense attorneys, politicians,to crime in order to support their habit. In the fourth
religious leaders, Hollywood celebrities and Democratsplace, many people while smoking marijauna, become
as well as many prosecutors and judges and as wellidiots, and while being forced to talk to or deal with
as a large part of the American public who havethose people may not be considered a crime... it
been brainwashed by the "politically correctshould be.
arbitrators", drug addicts are victims.Many people state that the laws against using certain
As far as I am concerned, that is a bunch ofdrugs are bad laws, therefore it is okay to break
hogwash. Drug addicts are most definitely criminals.those laws. Well, I have news for them, if they use
Not only are they criminals, they are as bad as, andthose drugs, they are breaking those laws (good or
should be punished in the same manner as, drugbad) and they are still criminals and they still deserve
peddlers.to be punished. Everyone has their own ideas as to
I don't feel sorry for drug users and addicts. A drugwhich laws are good and which laws are bad. If
user, with very few exceptions (ie: Someone with aneveryone only adhered to the laws that they
IQ of under sixty), knew the very first time he orapproved of then we would have anarchy.
she took illegal drugs that he or she was breaking theIf you don't like the current drug laws, work to have
law. Therefore, the drug user, at that point, becamethem changed. In the meantime every time you use
a criminal. The drug user was not only breaking theillegal drugs you are helping someone either, a criminal
law, he or she was also aiding and abetting theor a terrorist, get into a position where they can
criminal that gave or sold the user the drugs. Thecommit more crimes, including possibly taking the lives
user was providing, or would in the future provide,of innocent people. This means that you could,
money or services to the peddler that would enableindirectly, be killing innocent people in order to have
the peddler to stay in business and to break moreyour fun.
laws. If there were no users, there would be noAs far as I am concerned, anyone who would put
peddlers and if there were no peddlers there wouldpeople's lives in jeopardy in order to "enjoy" the use
be no drug lords. There would be no drug lords whoof illegal drugs, should be sent to prison for a long
could use their money to commit murder, nor causetime. The idea that we should be helping and
murder to be commited. There would be no drugrehabilitating these 'poor', 'abused' drug addicts is
lords to bribe government officials, no drug lords tobaloney. People that are addicted to illegal drugs
pay people to grow and cultivate plants to be turnedstarted out as criminals and are still criminals. They
into drugs. In other words if there were no drugknew that they were breaking the law and, unless
users there would be no drug trafficking.they were really stupid, they knew there was a
People have said to me, "I only smoke marijuana, andchance that they could become addicted. They might
smoking marijuana should not be against the lawhave thought that they were too smart or too
because it is no worse than drinking acohol.strong to become addicted, but they still knew that
Additionally, if it is a crime it is a victimless crime.". Ithere was, no matter how small, a chance that it
tell them that they are wrong. In the first placecould happen.
drinking alcohol is legal for people over the age ofRemember, if there were no drug users there would
twenty one (Whether or not drinking alcohol shouldbe no drug trafficking.