New York Car Accidents And Comparative Liability

With over 11.3 million licensed drivers in New York androde as a passenger n Driver A's car. If she suffered
over 300,000 motor vehicle accidents each year, it isinjuries, she could sue both drivers to collect on those
not surprising that I receive many phone calls fromdamages. Let's say the jury found Driver B 60
clients involved in car accidents. Often, identifying thepercent responsible and Driver A 40 percent liable. If
driver responsible for the accident is clear such asa jury awarded Cindy $100,000 in damages, then
when a person is hit from behind. Many cases areDriver A would pay $40,000 and Driver B would pay
less clear and might involve situations where both$60,000.
drivers bear some fault. In those auto accidents, NewIn reality, the drivers will not make those payments;
York law applies comparative liability.their insurance companies will. Suppose Driver A only
Comparative liability in a motor vehicle accidenthas a $25,000 policy and Driver B has a $100,000
occurs when both drivers (in a two car accident)policy. Under New York Law, once Driver A's policy
bear some responsibility for the accident. In thosewas exhausted, if the second driver has additional
cases, the two sides agree on the liability that eachcoverage, his policy will make up the difference. So
shares as part of a settlement or a jury will assign aDriver A's insurance company would pay Cindy the
percentage liability to each. Here's an example: Driverfull $25,000 policy. Driver B's insurance company
A rolls through a stop sign and makes a right turnwould pay a total of $75,000, including the $60,000
onto a main road. Driver B speeds on that main roadbecause of Driver B's liability and $15,000 making up
and strikes Driver A's car injuring Driver A. Let's sayfor what Driver A's policy does not have enough to
that Driver A sues the other motorist. In that case,cover. 
Driver A will assume some responsibility for rollingTo make this example of coverage for the
through the stop sign and Driver B will assume somepassenger clearer, let's say that Driver B only bore 1
responsibility for speeding and failing to avoid thepercent of the liability and Driver A bore 99 percent
accident. A jury might find Driver B liable, but only forcomparative liability. If Cindy were awarded $100,000
60 percent of the accident. Therefore, Driver Ain damages, Driver A would be responsible for
would bear 40 percent comparative liability.$99,000 and Driver B would be responsible for $1,000.
Comparative liability will affect the payment forBut, if Driver A only had $25,000 in insurance
damages. In the example I used above, let's say acoverage, Driver B's insurance policy would pay
jury awarded Driver A $100,000 in damages. Driver B$75,000 to make sure that the innocent passenger
would only have to pay his 60 percent of thewas fully compensated.
damages, or $60,000 as Driver A's comparativeI hope you have found this information helpful. As
liability would make him responsible for 40 percent oryou can see, there are many nuances in New York
$40,000 of his own damages.State law pertaining to motor vehicle accidents and
Let's vary this example to make a point about thecomparative liability. If you have questions, you
influence of comparative liability in New York. Let'sshould consult with a New York attorney
say that a jury found Driver B only 1 percentexperienced in handling motor vehicle accidents and
responsible and Driver A bears 99 percentcar crashes. If you have questions or a potential
comparative liability. If the damages are $100,000,case, I would be glad to assist you. You can call me
then Driver B has to pay $1,000.at 1-800-660-1466 or send me an e-mail at The
Let me add one additional variation pertaining toconsultation is free and I will be glad to help you.
passengers in an auto accident. Let's say that Cindy