New York Appellate Court ruled that Family Court lacked a solid foundation for granting custody to the father

This sets the path for women across the nation,delegates judicial responsibility to forensic experts.
never give up on your rights as a mother and fight.The question becomes, then, is this particular
The legal custody battle of a six year old little boyexpert’s opinion reliable enough to determine the
with special needs was returned to his mother Alysefate of children in child custody cases? This causes a
Larkin after a grueling thirteen (13) day trial and atremendous problem for litigants who might strike
hotly contested appeal that spanned through most ofthe wrong cord with these professionals.
2008 and 2009. In this judicial custody case, Ms.After all, Lisa Beth Older says, “professional
Larkin was represented by Lisa Beth Older, a highexperts are like anyone else, they come with their
profile custody lawyer who championed the rights ofown set of skills, insight, biases and
the mother.misapprehensions”.
In December of 2008, the Nassau Family Court (NewWhile the Court has a duty to review and consider
York Family Court Decision, docket numbersexpert recommendations, it is well settled that the
V-09582-07 and V-9760/07) initially granted sole legalCourt’s main focus is to weigh the totality of the
custody of the boy to the father, a New York policecircumstances of each individual case, determine the
officer who lives with his parents in Westchesterreliability of expert opinions, and arrive at a decision in
County.the best interests of the child, after giving due
On July 21, 2009 the Appellate Division of theconsideration to all of the testimony, evidence and
Supreme Court, Second Department, in the case ofexpert opinions. Older explained that “some
Larkin v. White, Appeal Number 2009-00143, reversedCourts, burdened with heavy case loads, might feel
the Family Court decision and granted sole legalthey have to rely heavily upon expert psychological
custody to the Mother with visitation rights to theopinions” or upon law guardian recommendations,
Father. The Appellate Court ruled that the Familyin the place of other more compelling evidence. There
Court decision lacked a sound and substantial basisis ample case law that says, where warranted, they
for granting custody to the father. In making theare not so obliged.
original decision, the lower court Judge extensively“In this case, the Court got it right, and the
quoted the recommendations of the forensic expertJustices were amazingly well prepared” says New
who recommended custody to the Father, while notYork divorce attorney Lisa Beth Older. The decision
giving due consideration to other compelling factorsof Larkin v. White is published on line at and may also
supporting an award of custody to the mother. Shebe seen at Lisa Beth Older, a high profile New York
also relied upon the law guardian’sdivorce attorney, has represented many celebrities.
recommendation, while not considering other factors.She first gained prominence in her field while
Ms. Older ponders that, “forensic experts andrepresenting a thirteen year old child in the 1997
attorneys for children play a pivotal role in childmurder trial People verses Wendy Gardner. Her work
custody cases” and points to “a vigorouswas later heralded in the book “Kill Grandma for
academic debate raging in the legal and medicalme”. As a New York divorce lawyer and
community” going to the reliability of expertappellate lawyer Lisa Beth Older has redefined herself
opinions and law guardian recommendations and thewith distinction in the field of divorce, custody and
weight afforded to them in the making of a childappellate law, representing parents in complex
custody decision. It has been reported in Appellatecustody cases in the New York City area. “This
Decisions and Law Review articles that Lower Courtscustody litigation was very hard on both
sometimes rely too heavily upon theparents”, says Lisa Beth Older, Esq., adding “I
recommendations of the attorney for the child andwas lucky to have had a great client.
the forensic expert and that doing so improperly